Task: Follow the template and steps below to complete your literature review and proposal. Remove any instructions provided, and replace them with the information required. Abstract (3 marks) Aim of the research (in summary form, to complete after literature review) Approach or methodology and innovation (in summary form, to complete after proposed methodology in section 4) Expected outcomes and significance (in summary form, to complete after literature review) Literature Review – Broad Scan and Reading (minimum 3 rounds) (3x3 = 9 marks) Round 1 What research interests lead you to the choice of initial keywords? List keywords, source/research database, number of results returned List out result: search results list presented in table format (first 20+, with NO detailed abstracts, Highlight the articles selected for detailed/focused reading) Title, author, year, journal/conference title Review & Summary (a paragraph of 6 -10 lines) What was your opinion after going through the initial search results list? What considerations led to the new set of keywords? List out the new keywords derived. Provide details of the articles/work identified-Title, author, year, journal/conference title, abstract These are the most relevant articles you find in round 1 search result list. Read these articles under focused reading. Present details of the articles in table format. Appendix (need to be conducted in round 1 broad scan but to be included at the end of the document, NOT here) including first 20+ returned search including detailed abstracts Title, author, year, journal/conference title, abstract Round 2 List keywords, derived in round 1, source/research database, number of results returned List out result: Up to 20 search results list, presented in table format with no detailed abstracts (Highlight the articles selected for detailed/focused reading) Title, author, year, journal/conference title Review & Summary (a paragraph of 6 -10 lines) What was your opinion after going through the initial search results list? What considerations led to the new set of keywords? List out the new keywords derived. Provide details of the articles/work identified-Title, author, year, journal/conference title, abstractà to be read in the focused reading These are the most relevant articles you find in round 2 search result list. Read these articles under focused reading. Present details of the articles in table format. Appendix (need to be conducted in round 2 broad scan but to be included at the end of the document, not here) including first 20+ returned search including detailed abstracts Title, author, year, journal/conference title, abstract Round 3 List keywords, derived in round 2, source/research database, number of results returned List out result: Up to 20 search results list, presented in table format with no detailed abstracts (Highlight the articles selected for detailed/focused reading) Title, author, year, journal/conference title Review & Summary (a paragraph of 6 -10 lines) What was your opinion after going through the search results list? What consideration led to the new set of keywords? List out the new keywords derived. Provide details of articles/work identified-Title, author, year, journal/conference title, abstract These are the most relevant articles you find in round 3 search result list. Read these articles under focused reading. Present details of the articles in table format. Appendix (need to be conducted in round 3 broad scan but to be included at the end of the document, not here) including first 20+ returned search including detailed abstracts Title, author, year, journal/conference title, abstract Literature Review – Focused Reading (2+ articles) (10 marks) You are expected to READ 4-6 articles identified from broad scan . Select the most suitable (minimum of 2) articles for focused reading. Your focused reading should achieve the following goals: Understand the background of current research (state of the art) Identify research problem for your research The research problem should be achievable with your capacity (knowledge, time, facilities), via practical methods Article 1, Title, author, year, journal/conference title, abstract (approximately 1 and a half page) What did the authors do (key contributions) Why did the authors conduct the research (existing problems) What are the key differences in the method/approach (innovation) What are main achievements, significance What can be further improved Research problems identified (to be reflected in the proposed research) Article 2, Title, author, year, journal/conference title, abstract (approximately 1 and a half page) What did the authors do (key contributions) Why did the authors conduct the research (existing problems) What are the key differences in the method/approach (innovation) What are main achievements, significance What can be further improved Research problems identified (to be reflected in the proposed research) Proposed Research (approximately half page to one page) (4 marks) Background or context. In summary format highlight what is lacking in the existing research. In particular use references to focus reading carried out in part 3. Aim of your research, what is to be researched, proposed or explored. Approach or methodology and innovation, based on the reading, the likely approaches, highlight the difference and innovation, with references. Expected outcomes and significance, what will be the contribution to human knowledge. Proposed work should be novel – has not been done before Needs to be achievable - are you capable in conducting the research and obtaining the expected outcomes?
Subject Name: Computer Science
Level: Undergraduate
If you want the solution to this assignment or want to discuss any other assignment or course you may contact us directly at order@bestacademicexperts.org or message us on Whatsapp or Viber at +91-9303607402 (http://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=919303607402&text=Hello%20 )
Comments