Over Weeks 11 to 13, you are required to meet as a group to choose two Australian companies that participate in either Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) or Integrated Reporting (IR). Specifically, as a group, students identify the two companies, their sustainability or integrated reports for the same year and collect any further published information on the company's approach to sustainability or non-financial reporting. Using the companies identified by the group, students are required to individually complete the assignment in two parts. Based on your two chosen companies, you should compare and contrast in a Report on their GRI or Integrated Reporting Output and Objectives and make a judgement on whether the companies' sustainability reports reflect the principles of the GRI/IR. (word limit 700 words) Choose one of the companies identified by the group and explain why you think the chosen company is ethical or not, based on either utilitarian or deontological/duty-based ethics theories covered in Week 8. Your answer should consider both actions your chosen company reports that might be viewed as ethical, and actions your chosen company reports that might be viewed as unethical. (word limit 700 words)
top of page
Search
Recent Posts
See All1. Estimate the costs for the four tires using an activity-based approach. (Hint: You will need to consider how the new information...
860
Background: Clinton and Jennifer Andrews live in Sydney with their two school-age children. They bought their home 15 years ago. With the...
180
Budget profit statement for sales and overheads and information for the preparation of a cash budget
Task 1: INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITY Included in the file are: a summary budget profit statement for sales and overheads and information for the...
180
bottom of page
Commenti